The Productivity Paradox
- Meghan Burelle

- Feb 18
- 3 min read

Why Busy Offices Aren’t Necessarily High-Performing Offices
Canadian organizations are under intense pressure right now.
Do more with less. Absorb inflation. Manage wage pressure. Increase productivity.
At the same time, many organizations are asking employees to spend more time in the office, while others are seeing uneven attendance patterns across teams and roles.
What’s consistent is this: offices are busier, but productivity is not necessarily improving.
Offices are busier, but productivity is not necessarily improving
The productivity paradox isn’t about people working less. It’s about organizations asking more from work environments, cultures, and systems that haven’t fully evolved.
That tension sits at the heart of the productivity paradox.
Busyness ≠ Effectiveness
Many workplaces were never designed for how work happens today.
Even before attendance patterns shifted, offices often struggled to support focused work, virtual collaboration, and in-person interaction at the same time. As demands increased, those gaps became more visible.
Today, it is common to see:
Individuals on back-to-back virtual calls in open work areas
Limited access to rooms designed for focused or confidential conversations
Informal collaboration happening in circulation space
Meeting rooms booked for video calls, not meetings
People are working hard. They are also managing constant cognitive load and interruption.
That is not a motivation issue. It is an environmental one.
Introducing the Productivity Ladder
To make sense of this, we developed the Productivity Ladder as a way to explain how productivity is actually created inside organizations.

Productivity does not start with output metrics or utilization targets. It is built through a sequence of reinforcing conditions:
Leadership establishes values
Values direct space
Space shapes behaviour
Behaviour amplifies culture
Culture ignites engagement
Engagement drives productivity
When any rung is weak, the impact shows up higher on the ladder.
Where Productivity Starts to Break Down
As attendance increases for some teams, many organizations are trying to fit more people into existing footprints. To do that, they often remove or reduce collaboration zones, focus rooms, and other spaces that support different work activities.
On the surface, this looks like efficiency.
In reality, it creates misalignment.
Work today includes deep focus, frequent virtual interaction, and in-person connection, often within the same day. When space is simplified to prioritize density, those activities compete rather than coexist. The result is a workplace that is full, but not fully functional.
The result is a workplace that is full, but not fully functional.
Behaviour Tells the Story
Space sends powerful signals.
When rooms designed for virtual calls are scarce, people take calls wherever they can. When focus spaces disappear, focused work becomes fragmented. When collaboration zones are removed, collaboration does not stop, it just becomes less effective.
Over time, behaviour shifts from performing to coping.
This is the critical middle of the Productivity Ladder, where space shapes behaviour and behaviour reinforces culture. If the workplace no longer supports how people are expected to work, engagement becomes harder to sustain.
Productivity stalls not because people are disengaged, but because the environment is working against them.
Productivity stalls not because people are disengaged, but because the environment is working against them.
A More Strategic Question
Instead of asking, “How many people can we fit into the office?” a more productive question is:
“What kind of work does our workplace really support?”
Productivity is not driven by presence alone. It is driven by alignment among values, space, and behaviour.
When the workplace reinforces how work happens, engagement follows. And when engagement is supported, productivity becomes an outcome rather than an aspiration.
That is the logic behind the Productivity Ladder. And it is where workplace strategy has the greatest opportunity to move the needle.
The productivity paradox isn’t about people working less. It’s about organizations asking more from work environments, cultures, and systems that haven’t fully evolved.
Meghan Burelle is a Workplace Strategist at Bennett Design. She partners with organizations to align space, culture, and business strategy, translating how work actually happens into environments that support performance. Her work focuses on data-driven insights, behavioural analysis, and creating workplaces that enable engagement and productivity.




Comments